Tuesday 3 March 2020

LEC 03/14


   
 EDUCATION AND TEACHING: CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS

A. EDUCATION
a. Definitions of Education
The Concept of Education is a very complex concept and thus cannot be defined in simple terms due to its diverse shades of meaning. It also applies to diverse activities and processes. Most definitions of education are descriptive in nature. As such, they do not capture a single idea but a family of ideas. The meaning of the word education can be accessed from the following perspectives:

    i) Etymological Definition
Etymology is the study of the origin of terms/words. The etymology of the term Education is traced back to latin verbs Educare and Educere

Educare (Pronounced as Eh-duh-kareh) :. In the ancient Rome, the verb Educare referred to the general process of growing up, of rearing, of bringing up. Originally, it designated both the rearing of plants, animals and the bringing up of children. Based on this definition, education has come to be viewed as the art of molding, of giving form to an incomplete or delicate person i.e. child. It later on presupposed the role of an adult molding the character, mind and psychomotor aspects of the learner.

Educere (Pronounced as Eh- duh-chereh): ‘Educere’ means to lead out or to bring out. In other words, the adult assists the child to come of age and realize his potential without any shade of coercion. The assumption is that the child is in possession of abilities/potential awaiting to be elicited by proper guidance..

(ii)    Descriptive Definition
Dictionary: This is the meaning as offered in a dictionary. The meaning  is descriptive in nature and inadequate because it tends to be general and vague e.g. the Fontana dictionary defines educating as:
Ø  Passing on a cultural heritage
Ø  Initiation of the young into worthwhile ways of thinking and doing.
Ø  Fostering of an individual’s growth.
This definition is limited because it does not explain the cardinal factors requisite in the process of educating namely that   which has to do with transmission i.e. how does one do it? Which component of cultural heritage is worth of education?

(ii)   Prescriptive Definition(Definitions according to great thinkers)
This perspective tends to be biased depending on the thinkers/theorists involved for instance:
Ø  Plato defined education in the laws as training
Ø  Comenius defined it is as the art of teaching all men all things
Ø  Milton defines it as the art of knowing everything
Ø  Lodge defines it as equivalent to experience i.e. the experience of man interacting with his/her normal environment.
These definitions tend towards the end that Education should achieve

The more we pursue the definition of the concept of education along the foregoing paths, the more complex it becomes. Realizing this, analytic philosophers have suggested necessary conditions or criteria of education


b. Criteria/Conditions/ Dimensions of Education

i.) R. S Peters' Criteria of Education

According to R S Peters (1966) in Ethics and Education:
1) Desirability condition: Education must involve the transmission of what is worthwhile, valuable or desirable (Normative Criteria)
2). Knowledge Condition: Education must involve knowledge and understanding, and some kind of cognitive perspective (Cognitive Criteria)
3). Procedural Condition: Education rules out certain procedures of transmission that lacks willingness and voluntaries on the part of the learner (Procedural Criteria)

Note: The Desirability criteria correspond to Ethics as a branch of Philosophy, the Cognitive criteria corresponds to Epistemology while the Procedural criteria have underpinnings in Logic. Metaphysical aspect has not been directly referred to in R. S. Peter's definition.


ii). Njoroge and Benaar's Dimensions of Education
Njoroge and Bennars in Theory and Practice of Education (1994) have reflected on these criteria and proposed four criteria or dimensions of education.

1. Cognitive Dimension: Education must involve the development of knowledge and understanding. Education presupposes the acquisition of knowledge – facts, skills, ideas, principles. It also involves intellectual activities like thinking, judging, reasoning, perceiving, deciding, abstraction, discrimination, intuition and imagination.

2. Creative Dimension: Education should involve the development of individuality. It should encourages the development of individual unique capacities and so it should make the individual creative rather than a docile recipient of knowledge. It should make one a tool – user rather that make one a tool. This happens through encouraging self- esteem, self–reliance, self–determination, self–expression and individual growth. Education that places emphasis on knowledge only may produce a person who is too academic but lacking social training. Besides being academically endowed, an educated person should actively participate as a creative agent.

3). Normative Dimension: Education should involve Socialization. Education takes place in a social setting and serves social functions. Education as Socialization is the acquisition of Knowledge, values, attitudes, skills to make learners acceptable members of society. These values and skills are passed from one generation to the next.  The aims (objectives), content and methods of education are socially determined. The norms and values transmitted ought to address the mind/the understanding level as opposed to mere habit formation.

4). Dialogical Dimension: Education should involve dialogue which is essentially a process of communication between the learner and the environment as well as between the learner and teacher. Education as dialogue encourages mutual respect, understanding, free debate and co-operation between learner and teacher. Methods that hinder free and active participation of both teacher and learners negate proper education. The methods should neither be too permissive nor too authoritarian.

Note: We can fully locate the philosophical map of Njoroge and Benaar's definition of Education as follows:
     Cognitive-Epistemology
     Creative- Metaphysics (and by extension Logic)
     Normative-Ethics and the wider Axiology
     Dialogical- Logic


  c. The Banking concept of Education of Paulo Freire
  i. General Description
Over-emphasis -on the cognitive dimension of education has reduced the learning process to an almost mechanical exercise in mental skills, normally known as training.
Banking Concept: Underlying all this is what Paolo Freire has called the banking concept of education revolving around the principle of deposit and withdrawal seen as operative in education.
Learners are regarded as knowledge banks, depositories, receptacles or empty vessels which are to be filled with knowledge which they are expected to keep and guard till it’s demanded back at the time of examination.
Passivity: Throughout, learners tend to be passive and docile in matters of knowledge and learning. They acquire notions without internalizing or understanding them fully. Learners become mere storehouses of facts, of intellectuals. Consequently, says Freire, what they have learnt does not in any way affect them personally in their daily understandings.
Externality: Knowledge remains external and the products of the system become full in their heads but empty in their hearts.

ii. Characteristics of the Banking Concept
Ø  Narration: The teacher narrates all they know to the learners who consume every word without alterations or questioning.
Ø  Memorization: The learner mechanically memorizes the narrated content. Learning becomes a process of conditioning and brain washing. An activity that is characterized by cramming and rot learning.
Ø  Tabula Rasa: Learners are perceived as empty vessels to be filled with knowledge from the teacher or textbooks.
Ø  Depositionism: Education becomes an act of depositing in which the teacher the depositor and the learner is the depository.
Ø  Superiorism: Education and knowledge in particular, is seen as a gift by those who consider themselves knowledgeable upon those they consider to know nothing.
Ø  Justificationism: The teacher considers the learners’ ignorance absolute and justifies his knowledgeability.

iii. Limitations of the Banking Concept of Education
Ø  Stifling: The banking activity in education stifles the learner’s creativity.
Ø  Competition: It creates unnecessary and unhealthy competition in the classroom.
Ø   False Premise: It is founded on the false premise that the learner is a tabula rasa and like an empty vessel. The learner always has something of their own that they bring with them into the educative process.
Ø  Passivity: It makes learners passive observers rather than active participants, creatures rather than creators in the process of acquiring knowledge. Thus knowledge obtained is to a large extent only skin deep and without internalization, it is short lived
Ø  Narrow-mindedness: The banking concept narrows the student’s outlook and vision. It perpetuates narrow mindedness and meanness of ideas in learners.
Ø  Undermining: It undermines the rational powers or abilities of the learner.
Ø  Counter productivity: It also promotes rot learning i.e. it emphasizes memory and recall which are often counterproductive in education.
NB: Personal involvement in the discovery of knowledge and internalization of knowledge by the learner are to be emphasized. Noting that knowledge cannot be acquired passively, the learners must be actively and directly involved.
………………………………………………………………………………………………

B. A SYNOPSIS OF THE CONCEPT OF TEACHING
 Teaching may refer to three aspects:
a)      An occupation or a profession.
b)      Normal activity of a teacher in a classroom or school situation (enterprise)
c)      Describing an actual teaching exercise.

   
(a)   Teaching as a profession
This entails the following:
Ø  An occupation by which a living is earned.
Ø  Deeper commitment.
Ø  Long duration of preparation/training.
Ø  Formal induction and acceptance.
Ø  Standard of performance or competence.
Ø  Code of regulations, ethics or practice to preserve the honor and prestige of the profession.
Ø  Willingness to advance the growth and effectiveness.
Ø  Regular scheme of payment and remuneration.
Ø  A great regard for the interest or advantage of the client.

(b)   Teaching as an enterprise
It refers to the cluster of activities that the teacher engages in within the school setting:
Ø  Marking registers.
Ø  Maintaining discipline.
Ø  Filling mark books.
Ø  Coordinating co-curricular activities.
Ø  Being on duty (TOD).

(c)    Actual teaching
Simply defined as a system of actions intended to induce learning. Must meet the following criteria:
i. Have a person who is consciously and deliberately doing the teaching.
ii. Another person or oneself who is being taught – learner is logically necessary.
iii. Something (content) being taught (facts, information, knowledge, skills).
iv. At least an intention on the part of the person doing the act that the recipient should learn.
v. Involve methods or procedures that are orally and pedagogically sound or acceptable.

d. William Frankena (1973)
According to William Frankena, Teaching is said to take place when 
 “X is fostering or seeking to foster in Y some disposition. D by method M.” Where

    X is the society, the teacher or whoever is educating (even oneself)
  Y is the leaner (child youth or adult)
  D is disposition beliefs, habit, knowledge, skills, attitudes considered desirable both for the leaner and society.
  M is morally acceptable methods that pay attention to the interest of the learner, personal integrity and active participation in the learning process. (Methods should not dehumanize or degrade the learner.)

LEC 02/14


EDF 211/ LECTURER TWO: FEBRURARY 25TH 2020

THE METHODS AND CONTENT OF TECHNICAL PHILOSOPHY
 METHODS OF TECHNICAL PHILOSOPHY
            a. Critical Method
The term ‘critical’ is derived from a Greek verb Krinein meaning to judge. It involves subjecting of values, facts, principles, conversations and assumptions; usually taken for granted to severe questioning. This is meant to encourage honesty of thought. It seeks to protect man from fanaticism and hypocrisy, intolerance and dogmatism, slogans and ideologies in order to liberate man from narrow mindedness. This method is also called the Socratic Method. It is liberating and constructive in the sense that it seeks to evaluate, to judge things in the light of clear and distinct ideas.

            b.    Analytical Method (The Rational Method)
It emphasized the need for logical and systematic thinking. Its greatly interested in logic being the art of correct reasoning. It consists of analysis and synthesis. Analysis method has to do with breaking issued into parts and by the power of systematic and logical thinking in order to arrive at a clear understanding. Such thinking must not be haphazard or confusing; it should be clear making the necessary distinctions separating clearly what is essential, what matters from what is accidental and of less importance.  It classified as primarily analytical thinking because it cuts an issue into parts, analyses concepts and statements. In addition, the method seeks to analyse concepts, statements and the language used in different contexts in order to clarify and justify meanings.Philosophical synthesis has to do with putting together the various parts of an idea to form a whole. It is used to complement philosophical analysis. Where else analysis breaks an issue into small parts, synthesis brings together the parts. The aim is to see something in its totality, see the inter-relationship and the overall framework. The limitation with the rational method is its sole reliance on mind as the source of knowledge neglecting ordinary sense experiences. Rationalists are thus regarded as idealists who do not live in the real world.
           
            c. The Speculative Method (Creativity)
Also called the metaphysical function. To speculate is to make an intelligent/rational guess. It endeavors to challenge the human mind as far as possible, to its ultimate limits in trying  to understand what is apparently incomprehensible. Man is not satisfied with knowing what happens to him, he also wants to know why. Basic issues of concern in life include; death, suffering happiness. There is no simple answer and many people explain or clarify them in religious terms believing religion will give the final answer.  Philosophers however prefer to explain these issues by use of human reason; they want to challenge the human mind as far as possible in trying to understand the incomprehensible. Speculation is very well utilized in a research hypothesis.

            d. Phenomenological Method
The term phenomenology originated from the Greek word ‘phenomenon’ meaning appearance and logia meaning knowledge. It designates the description or study of appearance especially if the appearances are sustained and penetrating. It considers the actual staring point of investigation to be the actual things as they appear, in their essential reality through experience. Things will appear different from one person to another. A philosopher’s concern is not the differences but to discover the underlying meaning and thus arrive at a deeper understanding of phenomena. By reflecting on an everyday human experience e.g. Of pain, joy, fear, frustration, a philosopher is able to explain the experience in concrete terms indicating in which manner the experience affects one’s life, whole being or existence. It involves a non-biased, non-prejudiced stance in examining phenomenon. Here, preconceived theoretical speculations are abandoned.

CONTENT OF PHILOSOPHY/BRANCHES OF TECHINICAL PHILOSOPHY
a. Epistemology
What is Epistemology?
This is the philosophical study of knowledge. Epistemology is derived from two Greek words: episteme (knowledge) and logia (study). It deals with philosophical reflection on issues related to knowledge. Epistemology does not deal with factual knowledge such as that which socio-sciences are involved. empirical sciences like Psychology and sociology study issues by describing in a factual manner what they have observed about human knowledge e.g. in cognitive development, a Psychologist will talk about how it differs in relation to age, individual and the society. The philosopher on the other hand  will not inform on facts and try to justify; instead, he will think before and after the scientist does his work thereby challenging the scientist. Epistemology distinguishes clearly between rationalism (which stresses the role of intellect in knowledge acquisition) and empiricism (pays attention to sense experience).
 It studies the nature, sources and validity of knowledge. It seeks to answer questions like:
    What is knowledge? How do we know? What is truth ? What can we really know/       What does it mean to say that I know something? What are the sources of knowledge?

b. Axiology
What is Axiology?
It is the philosophical/rational study of values. The term is derived from Greek words logia (study) and axia (values).
     Can Axiology be analyzed further?
It is subdivided into the following sub branches:
      Ethics or moral philosophy – reflects on the origin and nature of moral values: meaning of what is right and wrong.
      Aesthetics – philosophical study of artistic values. Interested in meaning of beauty, art.
      Social and cultural philosophy – study of values related to societies and cultures
      Political philosophy – deals with study of politics, governance etc.

What are the categories of values studied under Axiology?[1]
The philosophical study of values is restricted to the prescriptive domains. Values fall under three categories:
      Objective – values considered to be universal e.g. good, truth, beauty, freedom, love.
      Relative – values that depends on personal preference.
       Hierarchical – ordering values from the least desirable to the most desirable.


c. Metaphysics
iWhat is Metaphysics?
This term refers to what goes beyond the physics/nature.. It deals with questions, things or concerns that lie after or beyond the physical world of sense experience.  

ii. Subdivisions of Metaphysics
Metaphysics is traditionally divided into four areas:

1.      Cosmology: the study of the universe (cosmos). It has to do with the origin and nature meaning of the universe. This is done rationally.
2.      Theodicy: rational investigation of the supernatural. It belongs to the field of theology where religious concepts and beliefs are assessed.
3.      Rational or philosophical psychology: philosophy of the mind. It investigates into the intricate processes of perceiving, imagining, remembering, feeling, understanding, willing. It attempts to solve the mind/body problem; their composition, nature and relationship e.g. can mind survive destruction of the body?
4.      Ontology: the philosophical study of ‘being’. What is the meaning of existence? What comprises matter? What is man/woman? What is the essence of being? The meaning of Being: Anything Whatsoever that is or exists. Modes of Being : Physical/Material being, Spiritual being

iii. First Principles of Metaphysics
1.      Principle of Non Contradiction: A thing X cannot at the time be and not be
2.      Principle of Identity: Every being  is determined in itself, is one with itself, and is consistent in itself
3.      Principle of Intelligibility: Everything that is, inso far as it is , is intelligible
4.      Principle of Causality: Whatever comes to be has a cause
5.      Principle of Finality: Every agents acts //All beings when acting tend to some definite effect
6.      Principle of the Excluded middle: There cannot be an intermediate between contradictions
7.      Principle of Sufficient Reason: Everything that exists has sufficient reason for its existence

iv. Principles of Being:  Causality and Participation: causality is that from which something else proceeds with dependency in being. Participation; structural dependence of many beings on the one being. it means  to receive a part of what belongs to another fully and so merely sharing in it.

Types of causes
1.      Efficient cause: That by which any change is brought about in order of execution in order of execution.
2.      Material cause; That out which a new being arises-matter in regard to form
3.      Formal cause: The act by which a material substratum  is determined towards a new being
4.      Final cause: That because of which some is or becomes
Essence and Existence: Existence is the act whereby a thing is present in nature or in mind. Essence is mode or manner according to which really might be fashioned

Potency and Act: Potency is the aptitude in a being to receive some  or perform an act . Act is the fully present realization of Potency.
    
v.                  Substance and Accident(Details later)

 d. Logic
It refers to the study of correct reasoning. It deals with the structure and principles of sound arguments. On our daily basis, individuals are engaged in various forms of arguments, where premises/statements are made and conclusions drawn. In most cases, wrong conclusions are arrived at involving wrong premises and undue generalizations. Logic is essential because it stipulates how arguments should be constructed and how fallacies (erroneous beliefs or myths) can be detected and avoided. Within logic, two forms of reasoning can be distinguished:  deductive and inductive.

‘Definitions
i. Mental Operations
1.      Apprehension: Deals  with Conception (simple mental grasp of an  object-without further operation),
2.      Judgment : Mental sentence or proposition(Affirm or deny)
3.      Reasoning: Argument( Drawing Inferences, dealing with premises and conclusion)
ii. Reasoning : Mind's movement from one or more propositions which act as evidence for a final proposition which  calls for proof.
iii. Propositions: A proposition is any statement with truth value i.e. it can be proved to be true or false. e.g. Stones are cats. Propositions are never assessed in terms of validity. Its either True orFalse.
iv. Arguments: Is a set of Premises(evidential propositions)  and Conclusions(Claiming propositions).
v. Quarrelling: Not same as arguing- some of the statements in an quarrel are not propositions. Quarrelling is more of  a psychological activity than it is a Philosophical activity.
vi. Some symbols used in logic:
1.      >   If......then...(symbol for Biconditionality)
2.      v  Either.....or....(Symbol of disjunction)
3.      ^  Both.....and.....(Symbol of Conjunctionality)
4.      ≡ ....If and only if...(Symbol of Biconditionality)
5.       (   ){  }[  ] Brackets are used to separate collective Propositions
vi. Dimensions of Mordern logic
In modern philosophy, logic is expressed in two main dimensions:
Symbolic logic involving mathematical symbols – application of symbols to explain phenomena e. g a + b = 4: b= 4 – a
1.      Analytic logic – prevalently used by analytic philosophers who emphasize the logical analysis of language to arrive at clear  meanings of terms/concepts.
2.      Students studying science, arts or education should be familiar with the basic rules of logic so as to enable one reason correctly and use language meaningfully.
b.  Forms of Reasoning/ Types of arguments
i. Reductive Reasoning( Reductio ad absurdum)
            Reducing a statement to its opposite or absurdity
            P>-P  then -P
            If it is not raining then assume it's not raining
ii. Abductive Reasoning
Reasoning from the best possible explanation
ABD1
Given evidence E and candidate explanations H1,…, Hn of E, infer the truth of that Hi which best explains E.
ABD2
Given evidence E and candidate explanations H1,…, Hn of E, infer the truth of that Hi which explains E best, provided Hi is satisfactory/good enough qua explanation.
ABD3
Given evidence E and candidate explanations H1,…, Hn of E, if Hi explains E better than any of the other hypotheses, infer that Hi is closer to the truth than any of the other hypotheses.
 iii. Dialectical Reasoning: Synthesis from a Thesis and Anti thesis. No contradictions

iv. Deductive Reasoning
This involves reasoning from general to particular instances. In this case, a conclusion is inferred or deduced from  general premises/statements/propositions.

 Properties of a  Deductive argument
1.      Validity-( A deductive argument is valid if the conclusion necessarily logically affirms the premises. It is invalid if and only if it has all true premises and a False conclusion)
2.      Soundness:(A sound Deductive argument is one  which has  all      actually/factually true premises and true conclusion)
      Examples
1.      All PGDE students are untrained teachers
John is a PGDE student
John is an untrained teacher
2.      All human beings are liable to make mistakes
Mike is a human being
Mike makes mistakes
3.      All human beings have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God
Mary is a human being
Mary has sinned and fallen short of the glory of God
       4. All numbers  ending with 5 and 0 are divisible by 5
            1,964.5 Ends with 5
            conclusion?...........
     Further examples
            Private schools perform well in national exams
                              All Kikuyus are thieves
                  All Luos are proud
                  All university students are immoral
                  Teachers are hard working
                  All Philosophers are idiots
                  All cats are dogs

The above reasoning has been expressed in syllogism form: the  first two statements need to be stated before the third can follow logically. This type of reasoning is prevalent in philosophy, religion and mathematics.

 How to determine  validity of a deductive argument.....(To be continued)

v. Inductive reasoning(Continue Editing)
            It involves general laws/conclusions being inferred from particular instances. It is the reverse of deductive reasoning. In this type of reasoning, various instances of a given specimen are observed over a period of time. The observation leads to general conclusions/laws being established  with some level of probability. This type of reasoning is applicable with empirical sciences.

Example 1:  P1. Most Kenyans are corrupt
                    P2. Otieno is  a Kenyan
..............................................................................
Therefore probably Otieno is corrupt

Example 2: P1. There are 100 mangoes in the basket
                    P2. 70 of the mangoes picked are rotten
...............................................................................
Probably all the 100 mangoes are rotten
                   

   Properties of Inductive reasoning
1.      Strength: An inductive argument is said to be strong when it is  when it is such that  when the premises are assumed or granted to be true the its conclusion is most likely to be true.
2.      Cogency: An argument is Cogent when it is both strong and has actually true premises






 


[1]Philosophical reflection on values becomes necessary when people are no longer certain about what is important, worthwhile valuable for one’s life. It’s applied when people are faced with conflicting moral standards or confronted with radically opposed ideologies that call for the need for one to think about the foundation of morality and the society. Ethics/moral philosophy have a great link with education.