Friday, 15 May 2020

LECT 08/14



III. DIALOGICAL DIMENSION OF EDUCATION: EDUCATION AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON
1.      The term dialogue is derived from the Greek words ‘dia’ and ‘logos’ meaning communication or speaking words between two or more people. It is a moment where humans meet to reflect on their reality as they make and remake it.
2.      Education as a dialogue proposes a middle-ground approach between the traditional approach and the progressive approach to education. It attempts to bridge the gap between transmission and socialization, prevalent in traditional view and liberation and individualization emphasized by Progressivists. Proponents of dialogue observe that both views fail to address the basic meaning of human existence which is co-existence.
3.      This means that there should be no polarity between the individual and the society rather, both the society and the individual need to be catered for in education.
4.      Education ought to develop knowledge and understanding in ways that are consistent with the society’s values as well as the development of one’s personality; individual.
5.      Dialogue entails mutual agreement, mutual respect and understanding between individual and society. It encourages the process of speaking to each other. The teacher (representing society) and the learner ought to be involved in dialogue during their activities.
6.      The basis of the teacher learner relationship ought to be realization that the learner is a human being who has a right to exist and to express himself/herself.
7.      Dialogue requires the teacher and the learner to encounter each other as equals, each of them playing an essential role as far as education is concerned. Based on this equality, education should be seen as a process of communication.
8.      This aspect rules out methods and procedures of monologue which destroy the realization of a fulfilling education. Monologue constitutes an assault on the consciousness of the other, rendering it silent, passive etc.
9.      Dialogue makes education to be inter-subjective: a process involving encounter, participation.
10.  Education as dialogue rules out authoritarian approaches by the teacher i.e. force and corporal punishment. Such measures make students to be docile and submissive.

11.  It also rules out the eleviation of the learner above the teacher as advocated by the progressive movement. This is because doing so reduces the educating environment into a chaotic atmosphere. The teacher should not abdicate his position as an adult, but should exercise his/her role with care and concern, be humane to the learners.
12.  This will motivate them to seek after, to explore and inquire into knowledge under the caring guidance of the teacher. Essentially, dialogue is a democratic communication. It affirms the freedom of the participants to make and remake their culture in many ways.
13.  Dialogue puts the object to be known between the two subjects of knowing. They meet around it and through it for mutual inquiry.
14.  The educator/teacher normally has prior contact with the object to be known. It is he who presents it to the class for learners to discuss. However, the teacher’s prior knowledge of the object does not mean that he/she has exhausted all dimensions of the object.
15.  It is required that the teacher relearns to avoid transferring knowledge statically as a fixed possession of the teacher; dialogue demands a dynamic approximation towards the object.
16.  Dialogue does not mean that everyone in class must say something even if they have nothing to say. It only sustains a level of freedom for any learner who may want to say something.
17.  Dialogue requires that the starting point of learning be ordinary experiences of reality.
18.  There should be no dichotomy between reality and the content of study. Conceptualize knowledge as much as possible.
19.  Teaching should be conversational; moderate your voice accordingly.
20.  Making learning task oriented – problem based.
21.  Teacher must be able to grasp the learner’s entry behaviour in terms of their critical level of cognition, literacy and vocabulary, political and social ideas they possess.
22.  The words used ought to be familiar – clarity of words will result into clarity of thought hence effective communication.
Emphasis
Role of teacher
Role of learner
Methods of instruction






PAUL FREIRE







IVAN ILLICH



No comments: